That journalists of the New York times can be lead to run a front page with a copped photograph that is not what it purports to be. In fact quite the opposite. Just as it is amazing that the BBC – the international jewel in Britain’s crowns – can run an entire documentary which turns out to be a propaganda exercise for terrorists. I can see the university education these journalists took must have been virulently anti-Zionist and so in the careers they are hamstrung by their lack of reading and by their assumptions. But is that really any excuse? they are supposed to investigate and what these men and women are doing is concluding they know, before they find out.
Shameful.